linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] f2fs: Fix deadlock in shutdown ioctl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 16 May 2018 14:48:42 +0800
From:   Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
To:     Sahitya Tummala <stummala@...eaurora.org>
CC:     Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>,
        <linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] f2fs: Fix deadlock in shutdown ioctl

On 2018/5/15 15:57, Sahitya Tummala wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 11:39:42AM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 2018/5/10 21:20, Sahitya Tummala wrote:
>>> f2fs_ioc_shutdown() ioctl gets stuck in the below path
>>> when going down with full sync (F2FS_GOING_DOWN_FULLSYNC)
>>> option.
>>>
>>> __switch_to+0x90/0xc4
>>> percpu_down_write+0x8c/0xc0
>>> freeze_super+0xec/0x1e4
>>> freeze_bdev+0xc4/0xcc
>>> f2fs_ioctl+0xc0c/0x1ce0
>>> f2fs_compat_ioctl+0x98/0x1f0
>>>
>>> Fix this by not holding write access during this ioctl.
>>
>> I think we can just remove lock coverage for F2FS_GOING_DOWN_FULLSYNC path, for
>> other path, we need to keep as it is.
>>
> 
> Thanks, I thought about it too but then I checked that XFS shutdown ioctl is
> not taking any lock for this ioctl. Hence, I followed the same in F2FS.
> Do you know why XFS is not taking any lock? 

I don't know. :(

> Is it really needed in shutdown ioctl?

IMO, yes, we should keep freeze and remount be aware of the shutdown operation.

Thanks,

> 
> --
> Sent by a consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
> 
>