linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 0/8] Improving compiler inlining decisions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 15 May 2018 22:48:02 -0500
From:   Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To:     Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, nadav.amit@...il.com,
        Alok Kataria <akataria@...are.com>,
        Christopher Li <sparse@...isli.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        linux-sparse@...r.kernel.org,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/8] Improving compiler inlining decisions

On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 07:11:07AM -0700, Nadav Amit wrote:
> This patch-set deals with an interesting yet stupid problem: code that
> does not get inlined despite its simplicity.

I got the 0/8 patch twice, and didn't get the 1/8 patch.  Was there an
issue with the sending of the patches?

-- 
Josh