linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH V2] scsi: ufs: Add specific callback for setting DMA mask

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 16 May 2018 10:01:01 +0530
From:   Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...il.com>
To:     Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>
Cc:     linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
        vinayak holikatti <vinholikatti@...il.com>,
        subhashj@...eaurora.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Shaik Ameer Basha <shaik.ameer@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V2] scsi: ufs: Add specific callback for setting DMA mask

Ping !!!

On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 4:33 PM, Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com> wrote:
> Currently DMA mask for UFS HCI is set by reading CAP register's
> [64AS] bit. Some HCI controller like Exynos support 36-bit bus address.
> This works perfectly fine with DMA mask set as 64 in case there is no
> IOMMU attached to HCI.
> In case if HCI is behind an IOMMU, setting DMA mask as 64 bit won't
> work as HCI has only 36bit addressing and SMMU has created mapping of
> 64 bit and as the device truncates the address, its mapping will not
> be found by iommu.
> To resolve such issues, let the variant driver sets its own DMA mask.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 3 +++
>  drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h | 2 ++
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> I am not sure if there are other ways available to handle such cases.
> The IOMMU I am talking about is arm-smmu and it DT binding does not
> give much idea about handling such cases.
> Have tested this patch with HCI controller with IOMMU attached.
>
> Changes Since V1:
>         - Fixed build issue as reported by Kbuild test robot.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> index a355d98..9a1374e 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> @@ -7781,6 +7781,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ufshcd_dealloc_host);
>   */
>  static int ufshcd_set_dma_mask(struct ufs_hba *hba)
>  {
> +       if (hba->vops && hba->vops->set_dma_mask)
> +               return hba->vops->set_dma_mask(hba);
> +
>         if (hba->capabilities & MASK_64_ADDRESSING_SUPPORT) {
>                 if (!dma_set_mask_and_coherent(hba->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64)))
>                         return 0;
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
> index 1332e54..89c6dae 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
> @@ -297,6 +297,7 @@ struct ufs_pwr_mode_info {
>   * @resume: called during host controller PM callback
>   * @dbg_register_dump: used to dump controller debug information
>   * @phy_initialization: used to initialize phys
> + * @set_dma_mask: used to set variant specific DMA mask
>   */
>  struct ufs_hba_variant_ops {
>         const char *name;
> @@ -325,6 +326,7 @@ struct ufs_hba_variant_ops {
>         int     (*resume)(struct ufs_hba *, enum ufs_pm_op);
>         void    (*dbg_register_dump)(struct ufs_hba *hba);
>         int     (*phy_initialization)(struct ufs_hba *);
> +       int     (*set_dma_mask)(struct ufs_hba *hba);
>  };
>
>  /* clock gating state  */
> --
> 2.7.4
>



-- 
Regards,
Alim