lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 16 May 2018 08:42:40 -0600
From:   Keith Busch <keith.busch@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharatku@...inx.com>
Cc:     "linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "keith.busch@...el.com" <keith.busch@...el.com>,
        "axboe@...com" <axboe@...com>, "hch@....de" <hch@....de>,
        "sagi@...mberg.me" <sagi@...mberg.me>
Subject: Re: INTMS/INTMC not being used in NVME interrupt handling

On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 12:35:15PM +0000, Bharat Kumar Gogada wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> As per NVME specification: 
> 7.5.1.1 Host Software Interrupt Handling
> It is recommended that host software utilize the Interrupt Mask Set and Interrupt Mask Clear (INTMS/INTMC) 
> registers to efficiently handle interrupts when configured to use pin based or MSI messages.
> 
> In kernel 4.14, drivers/nvme/host/pci.c function nvme_isr 
> doesn't  use these registers. 
> 
> Any reason why these registers are not used in nvme interrupt handler ?

I think you've answered your own question: we process completions in the
interrupt context. The interrupt is already masked at the CPU level in
this context, so there should be no reason to mask them at the device
level.
 
> Why NVMe driver is not using any bottom half and processing all completion queues
> in interrupt handler ?

Performance.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ