lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 18 May 2018 21:04:40 +0800
From:   Jia He <hejianet@...il.com>
To:     Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@....com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu
Cc:     Suzuki.Poulose@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        jia.he@...-semitech.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: arm/arm64: harden unmap_stage2_ptes in case
 end is not PAGE_SIZE aligned



On 5/18/2018 5:48 PM, Marc Zyngier Wrote:
> On 18/05/18 10:27, Jia He wrote:
>> If it passes addr=0x202920000,size=0xfe00 to unmap_stage2_range->
>> ...->unmap_stage2_ptes, unmap_stage2_ptes will get addr=0x202920000,
>> end=0x20292fe00. After first while loop addr=0x202930000, end=0x20292fe00,
>> then addr!=end. Thus it will touch another pages by put_pages() in the
>> 2nd loop.
>>
>> This patch fixes it by hardening the break condition of while loop.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: jia.he@...-semitech.com
>> ---
>> v2: newly added
>>
>>  virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c b/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
>> index 8dac311..45cd040 100644
>> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
>> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
>> @@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ static void unmap_stage2_ptes(struct kvm *kvm, pmd_t *pmd,
>>  
>>  			put_page(virt_to_page(pte));
>>  		}
>> -	} while (pte++, addr += PAGE_SIZE, addr != end);
>> +	} while (pte++, addr += PAGE_SIZE, addr < end);
>>  
>>  	if (stage2_pte_table_empty(start_pte))
>>  		clear_stage2_pmd_entry(kvm, pmd, start_addr);
>>
> 
> I don't think this change is the right thing to do. You get that failure
> because you're being passed a size that is not a multiple of PAGE_SIZE.
> That's the mistake.
> 
> You should ensure that this never happens, rather than changing the page
> table walkers (which are consistent with the way this kind of code is
> written in other places of the kernel). As you mentioned in your first
> patch, the real issue is that KSM is broken, and this is what should be
> fixed.
> 
Got it, thanks
Should I resend the patch 1/2 without any changes after droping patch 2/2?

-- 
Cheers,
Jia

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ