linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/5] ARM: trusted_foundations: Implement L2 cache initialization callback

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 20 May 2018 15:08:06 +0100
From:   Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To:     Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
Cc:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Peter Geis <pgwipeout@...il.com>,
        Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/5] ARM: trusted_foundations: Implement L2 cache
 initialization callback

On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 01:15:38PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> Implement L2 cache initialization firmware callback that should be invoked
> early in boot to enable cache HW.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/firmware/trusted_foundations.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/firmware/trusted_foundations.c b/arch/arm/firmware/trusted_foundations.c
> index 3fb1b5a1dce9..198ce5c75ca0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/firmware/trusted_foundations.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/firmware/trusted_foundations.c
> @@ -18,8 +18,13 @@
>  #include <linux/init.h>
>  #include <linux/of.h>
>  #include <asm/firmware.h>
> +#include <asm/outercache.h>
>  #include <asm/trusted_foundations.h>
>  
> +#define TF_CACHE_MAINT		0xfffff100
> +
> +#define TF_CACHE_INIT		1
> +
>  #define TF_SET_CPU_BOOT_ADDR_SMC 0xfffff200
>  
>  #define TF_CPU_PM		0xfffffffc
> @@ -63,9 +68,27 @@ static int tf_prepare_idle(void)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CACHE_L2X0
> +static void tf_cache_write_sec(unsigned long val, unsigned int reg)
> +{
> +	pr_warn("%s: Ignoring write [0x%x]: 0x%08lx\n", __func__, reg, val);

Why at warning level?  Is this some issue that the user needs to be
warned about?

-- 
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 8.8Mbps down 630kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 8.21Mbps down 510kbps up