lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 22 May 2018 10:59:07 +0300
From:   <ilialin@...eaurora.org>
To:     "'Sudeep Holla'" <sudeep.holla@....com>, <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        <sboyd@...nel.org>, <robh@...nel.org>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
        <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>, <nm@...com>, <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        <broonie@...nel.org>, <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
        <david.brown@...aro.org>, <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        <will.deacon@....com>, <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
        <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>, <nicolas.dechesne@...aro.org>,
        <celster@...eaurora.org>, <tfinkel@...eaurora.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] cpufreq: Add Kryo CPU scaling driver

OK, I think I found out the way. Would this be correct?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
extern struct cpu_topology cpu_topology[NR_CPUS];

static struct device *qcom_cpufreq_kryo_get_cluster_lead(int cluster)
{
	unsigned cpu;

	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
		if ((cluster == cpu_topology[cpu].cluster_id) &&
			(0 == cpu_topology[cpu].core_id))
			return get_cpu_device(cpu);
	}

	return NULL;
}
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ilialin@...eaurora.org <ilialin@...eaurora.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2018 09:56
> To: 'Sudeep Holla' <sudeep.holla@....com>; 'mturquette@...libre.com'
> <mturquette@...libre.com>; 'sboyd@...nel.org' <sboyd@...nel.org>;
> 'robh@...nel.org' <robh@...nel.org>; 'mark.rutland@....com'
> <mark.rutland@....com>; 'viresh.kumar@...aro.org'
> <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>; 'nm@...com' <nm@...com>;
> 'lgirdwood@...il.com' <lgirdwood@...il.com>; 'broonie@...nel.org'
> <broonie@...nel.org>; 'andy.gross@...aro.org' <andy.gross@...aro.org>;
> 'david.brown@...aro.org' <david.brown@...aro.org>;
> 'catalin.marinas@....com' <catalin.marinas@....com>;
> 'will.deacon@....com' <will.deacon@....com>; 'rjw@...ysocki.net'
> <rjw@...ysocki.net>; 'linux-clk@...r.kernel.org' <linux-
> clk@...r.kernel.org>
> Cc: 'devicetree@...r.kernel.org' <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>; 'linux-
> kernel@...r.kernel.org' <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>; 'linux-
> pm@...r.kernel.org' <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>; 'linux-arm-
> msm@...r.kernel.org' <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>; 'linux-
> soc@...r.kernel.org' <linux-soc@...r.kernel.org>; 'linux-arm-
> kernel@...ts.infradead.org' <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>;
> 'rnayak@...eaurora.org' <rnayak@...eaurora.org>;
> 'amit.kucheria@...aro.org' <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>;
> 'nicolas.dechesne@...aro.org' <nicolas.dechesne@...aro.org>;
> 'celster@...eaurora.org' <celster@...eaurora.org>;
> 'tfinkel@...eaurora.org' <tfinkel@...eaurora.org>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] cpufreq: Add Kryo CPU scaling driver
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
> > Sent: Monday, May 21, 2018 16:05
> > To: ilialin@...eaurora.org; mturquette@...libre.com; sboyd@...nel.org;
> > robh@...nel.org; mark.rutland@....com; viresh.kumar@...aro.org;
> > nm@...com; lgirdwood@...il.com; broonie@...nel.org;
> > andy.gross@...aro.org; david.brown@...aro.org;
> > catalin.marinas@....com; will.deacon@....com; rjw@...ysocki.net;
> > linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
> > Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>; devicetree@...r.kernel.org;
> > linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-pm@...r.kernel.org; linux-arm-
> > msm@...r.kernel.org; linux-soc@...r.kernel.org; linux-arm-
> > kernel@...ts.infradead.org; rnayak@...eaurora.org;
> > amit.kucheria@...aro.org; nicolas.dechesne@...aro.org;
> > celster@...eaurora.org; tfinkel@...eaurora.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Add Kryo CPU scaling driver
> >
> >
> >
> > On 21/05/18 13:57, ilialin@...eaurora.org wrote:
> > >
> > [...]
> >
> > >>> +#include <linux/cpu.h>
> > >>> +#include <linux/err.h>
> > >>> +#include <linux/init.h>
> > >>> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> > >>> +#include <linux/module.h>
> > >>> +#include <linux/nvmem-consumer.h> #include <linux/of.h> #include
> > >>> +<linux/platform_device.h> #include <linux/pm_opp.h> #include
> > >>> +<linux/slab.h> #include <linux/soc/qcom/smem.h>
> > >>> +
> > >>> +#define MSM_ID_SMEM	137
> > >>> +#define SILVER_LEAD	0
> > >>> +#define GOLD_LEAD	2
> > >>> +
> > >>
> > >> So I gather form other emails, that these are physical cpu
> > >> number(not even unique identifier like MPIDR). Will this work on
> > >> parts or platforms that need to boot in GOLD LEAD cpus.
> > >
> > > The driver is for Kryo CPU, which (and AFAIK all multicore MSMs)
> > > always boots on the CPU0.
> >
> >
> > That may be true and I am not that bothered about it. But assuming
> > physical ordering from the logical cpu number is *incorrect* and will
> > break if kernel decides to change the allocation algorithm. Kernel
> > provides no guarantee on that, so you need to depend on some physical
> > ID or may be DT to achieve what your want. But the current code as it
> stands is wrong.
> 
> Got your point. In fact CPUs are numbered 0-3 and ordered into 2 clusters in
> the DT:
> 
> cpus {
> 	#address-cells = <2>;
> 	#size-cells = <0>;
> 
> 	CPU0: cpu@0 {
> 		...
> 		reg = <0x0 0x0>;
> 		...
> 	};
> 
> 	CPU1: cpu@1 {
> 		...
> 		reg = <0x0 0x1>;
> 		...
> 	};
> 
> 	CPU2: cpu@100 {
> 		...
> 		reg = <0x0 0x100>;
> 		...
> 	};
> 
> 	CPU3: cpu@101 {
> 		...
> 		reg = <0x0 0x101>;
> 		...
> 	};
> 
> 	cpu-map {
> 		cluster0 {
> 			core0 {
> 				cpu = <&CPU0>;
> 			};
> 
> 			core1 {
> 				cpu = <&CPU1>;
> 			};
> 		};
> 
> 		cluster1 {
> 			core0 {
> 				cpu = <&CPU2>;
> 			};
> 
> 			core1 {
> 				cpu = <&CPU3>;
> 			};
> 		};
> 	};
> };
> 
> As far, as I understand, they are probed in the same order. However, to be
> certain that the physical CPU is the one I intend to configure, I have to fetch
> the device structure pointer for the cpu-map -> clusterX -> core0 -> cpu path.
> Could you suggest a kernel API to do that?
> 
> 
> 
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Sudeep

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ