lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 23 May 2018 10:40:48 +0200
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
        Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, liuwei@...ions-semi.com,
        mp-cs@...ions-semi.com, 96boards@...obotics.com,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
        Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        hzhang@...obotics.com, bdong@...obotics.com,
        Mani Sadhasivam <manivannanece23@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] MAINTAINERS: Add Actions Semi S900 pinctrl entries

On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 7:17 AM, Manivannan Sadhasivam
<manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org> wrote:

> Add S900 pinctrl entries under ARCH_ACTIONS
>
> Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>

Patch applied tentatively so we have some maintenance entry for this.

Andreas expressed concerns about the driver earlier, so he might want it
split from the platform parts and have a separate entry for the pinctrl+GPIO
so Manivannan can maintain that part, also it makes sense to list
Manivannan as comaintainer of ARCH_ACTIONS with this in.

Andreas: how would you like to proceed?

I understand that I was a bit pushy or even rude in my last message
about the maintenance of this platform and the code structure of
the pin control driver. I am sorry if it caused any bad feelings on your
side :( social conflicts give me the creeps, I just try my best. Maybe
my best isn't always what it should be.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ