linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: cpufreq: Introduce QCOM CPUFREQ FW bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 24 May 2018 11:13:33 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:     Taniya Das <tdas@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
        Amit Nischal <anischal@...eaurora.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org>,
        Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: cpufreq: Introduce QCOM CPUFREQ FW
 bindings

On 24-05-18, 10:48, Taniya Das wrote:
> Hello Rob, Viresh,
> 
> Thank you for the comments. If I understand correctly, the device tree nodes
> should look something like the below.
> 
> Though I am not sure if any vendor name could be associated in the cpu
> nodes.

Well Rob said Yes to that I think.

> Please suggest if my understanding is wrong.
> 
> cpu@0 {
> 	qcom,freq-domain = <&freq_domain_table0>;
> 	…
> };
> 
> same follows for cpu 1/2/3
> 
> cpu@400 {
> 	qcom,freq-domain = <&freq_domain_table1>;
> 	…
> };
> same follows for cpu 5/6/7
> 
> freq_domain_table0 : freq_table {
> 	reg = < >, < >, < > ;
> 	reg-names = "perf_base", "lut_base", "en_base";
> };
> 
> freq_domain_table1 : freq_table {
> 	reg = < >, < >, < > ;
> 	reg-names = "perf_base", "lut_base", "en_base";
> };

Mostly yes.

-- 
viresh