linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Re: Problem: lockdep warning with nested instances of i2c-mux

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 24 May 2018 11:21:31 -0700
From:   John Sperbeck <jsperbeck@...gle.com>
To:     peda@...ntia.se
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, wsa@...-dreams.de,
        peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, will.deacon@....com,
        dave@...olabs.net, pombredanne@...b.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
        Peter Chang <dpf@...gle.com>,
        Deepa Dinamani <deepadinamani@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Re: Problem: lockdep warning with nested instances
 of i2c-mux

On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 6:52 AM Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se> wrote:

> Hi!

> Sorry for spamming. At least I'm finding these embarrassing f$&%ups
> myself, not that it helps all that much, but...

> Changes since v2    https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/5/24/176
> - EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt_mutex_lock_nested) is more appropriate (the
>    rt_ prefix was missing).


Yes, after fixing the "rt_" typo, this addresses our use case.  Thanks for
the quick response.