linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1] cpufreq: tegra20: Fix imbalanced clock enable count

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 24 May 2018 11:36:59 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:     Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
Cc:     Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] cpufreq: tegra20: Fix imbalanced clock enable count

On Wednesday, May 23, 2018 11:30:39 AM CEST Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> On 23.05.2018 08:58, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > On 23-05-18, 00:14, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> >> Tegra20-cpufreq driver missed enabling the CPU clocks. This results in a
> >> clock-enable refcount disbalance on PLL_P <-> PLL_X reparent, causing
> >> PLL_X to get disabled while it shouldn't. Fix this by enabling the clocks
> >> on the driver probe.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> CPUFreq maintainers,
> >>
> >> Please take into account that this patch is made on top of my recent
> >> series of patches [0] "Clean up Tegra20 cpufreq driver" that was fully
> >> reviewed, but seems not applied yet. Let me know if you prefer to re-spin
> >> the [0], including this patch into the series.
> >>
> >> [0] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-tegra/list/?series=45321
> > 
> > This is already picked by Rafael and is sitting in pm/bleeding-edge
> > branch. Should get merged into linux-next in a day or two.
> 
> Neat, thank you for letting me know.

It actually is there in my linux-next branch, but linux-next proper is not
taking new material this week AFAICS.

You'll see this in linux-next on Monday, most probably.