linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v6 09/11] firmware: xilinx: Add debugfs for clock control APIs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 25 May 2018 19:23:49 +0000
From:   Jolly Shah <JOLLYS@...inx.com>
To:     Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
        "ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org" <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
        "mingo@...nel.org" <mingo@...nel.org>,
        "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "matt@...eblueprint.co.uk" <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
        "hkallweit1@...il.com" <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        "keescook@...omium.org" <keescook@...omium.org>,
        "dmitry.torokhov@...il.com" <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        "mturquette@...libre.com" <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        "sboyd@...eaurora.org" <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
        "michal.simek@...inx.com" <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
        "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     Rajan Vaja <RAJANV@...inx.com>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 09/11] firmware: xilinx: Add debugfs for clock control
 APIs

Hi Sudeep,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sudeep Holla [mailto:sudeep.holla@....com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2018 1:58 AM
> To: Jolly Shah <JOLLYS@...inx.com>; ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org;
> mingo@...nel.org; gregkh@...uxfoundation.org; matt@...eblueprint.co.uk;
> hkallweit1@...il.com; keescook@...omium.org;
> dmitry.torokhov@...il.com; mturquette@...libre.com;
> sboyd@...eaurora.org; michal.simek@...inx.com; robh+dt@...nel.org;
> mark.rutland@....com; linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>; Rajan Vaja <RAJANV@...inx.com>;
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> devicetree@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 09/11] firmware: xilinx: Add debugfs for clock control
> APIs
> 
> 
> 
> On 14/05/18 20:18, Jolly Shah wrote:
> > Hi Sudeep,
> 
> [..]
> 
> >>
> >> As I mentioned in earlier patch, I don't see the need for this
> >> debugfs interface. Clock lay has read-only interface in debugfs
> >> already. Also if you want to debug clocks, you can do so using the
> >> driver which uses these clocks. Do you really want to manage clocks
> >> in user-space ? The whole idea of EEMI kind of interface is to
> >> abstract and hide the fine details even from non-trusted rich OS like
> >> Linux kernel, but by providing this you are doing exactly opposite.
> >
> > No we don't want to manage clocks in user-space. This debugfs is meant
> > for developer who wants to debug APIs behavior in case something
> > doesn't work as expected. Debugfs should be off by default in
> > production images.
> >
> 
> Good that it's not used in production image. The clock layer has
> *sufficient* debugfs support that will *help in debugging*. So please drop this
> Xilinx specific clock debugfs.
> 
> --
> Regards,
> Sudeep

Ok. Will remove them in next version. Let me know if rest changes look ok and I can submit final version with suggested minor changes.

Thanks,
Jolly Shah