linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 2/2] perf: Sharing PMU counters across compatible events

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 28 May 2018 13:26:18 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com, tj@...nel.org,
        jolsa@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/2] perf: Sharing PMU counters across compatible events

On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 04:11:02PM -0700, Song Liu wrote:
> +/*
> + * If an dup event is already active, add this event as follower, and
> + * return 0; otherwise, return -EAGAIN
> + *
> + * RFC NOTE: this an o(1) operation
> + */
> +static int event_dup_try_add_follower(struct perf_event *event,
> +				      struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx)
> +{
> +	struct perf_event_dup *pdup;
> +
> +	if (event->dup_id >= cpuctx->dup_event_count)
> +		return -EAGAIN;
> +
> +	pdup = &cpuctx->dup_event_list[event->dup_id];
> +	if (list_empty(&pdup->active_dup))
> +		return -EAGAIN;
> +
> +	list_add_tail(&event->dup_sibling_entry, &pdup->active_dup);
> +	pdup->master->pmu->read(pdup->master);
> +	event->dup_base_count = pdup_read_count(pdup);
> +	event->dup_base_child_count = pdup_read_child_count(pdup);
> +	return 0;
> +}

> +/*
> + * remove event from the dup list; if it is the master, and there are
> + * other active events, promote another event as the new master.
> + *
> + * return 0, if it is there are more active events in this dup;
> + * return -EAGAIN, if it is the last active event
> + *
> + * RFC NOTE: this an o(1) operation
> + */
> +static int event_dup_sched_out(struct perf_event *event,
> +			       struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx)
> +{
> +	struct perf_event_dup *pdup;
> +
> +	if (event->dup_id >= cpuctx->dup_event_count)
> +		return -EAGAIN;
> +
> +	pdup = &cpuctx->dup_event_list[event->dup_id];
> +	list_del_init(&event->dup_sibling_entry);
> +	if (event == pdup->master ) {
> +		if (list_empty(&pdup->active_dup)) {
> +			pdup->master = NULL;
> +			return -EAGAIN;

This one is really odd.. -EAGAIN doesn't make sense for the last event.
I see how you got here, but yuck.

> +		} else {
> +			struct perf_event *new_master;
> +
> +			new_master = list_first_entry(
> +				&cpuctx->dup_event_list[event->dup_id].active_dup,
> +				struct perf_event, dup_sibling_entry);
> +			event_dup_sync(new_master, cpuctx);
> +			pdup_switch_master(pdup, event, new_master);
> +			pdup->master = new_master;
> +		}
> +	}
> +	return 0;
> +}