linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 171/329] Btrfs: send, fix issuing write op when processing hole in no data mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 28 May 2018 12:01:40 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Filipe Manana <fdmanana@...e.com>,
        David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
        Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 171/329] Btrfs: send, fix issuing write op when processing hole in no data mode

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@...e.com>

[ Upstream commit d4dfc0f4d39475ccbbac947880b5464a74c30b99 ]

When doing an incremental send of a filesystem with the no-holes feature
enabled, we end up issuing a write operation when using the no data mode
send flag, instead of issuing an update extent operation. Fix this by
issuing the update extent operation instead.

Trivial reproducer:

  $ mkfs.btrfs -f -O no-holes /dev/sdc
  $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd
  $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt/sdc
  $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt/sdd

  $ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xab 0 32K" /mnt/sdc/foobar
  $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sdc /mnt/sdc/snap1

  $ xfs_io -c "fpunch 8K 8K" /mnt/sdc/foobar
  $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sdc /mnt/sdc/snap2

  $ btrfs send /mnt/sdc/snap1 | btrfs receive /mnt/sdd
  $ btrfs send --no-data -p /mnt/sdc/snap1 /mnt/sdc/snap2 \
       | btrfs receive -vv /mnt/sdd

Before this change the output of the second receive command is:

  receiving snapshot snap2 uuid=f6922049-8c22-e544-9ff9-fc6755918447...
  utimes
  write foobar, offset 8192, len 8192
  utimes foobar
  BTRFS_IOC_SET_RECEIVED_SUBVOL uuid=f6922049-8c22-e544-9ff9-...

After this change it is:

  receiving snapshot snap2 uuid=564d36a3-ebc8-7343-aec9-bf6fda278e64...
  utimes
  update_extent foobar: offset=8192, len=8192
  utimes foobar
  BTRFS_IOC_SET_RECEIVED_SUBVOL uuid=564d36a3-ebc8-7343-aec9-bf6fda278e64...

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 fs/btrfs/send.c |    3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

--- a/fs/btrfs/send.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/send.c
@@ -4822,6 +4822,9 @@ static int send_hole(struct send_ctx *sc
 	u64 len;
 	int ret = 0;
 
+	if (sctx->flags & BTRFS_SEND_FLAG_NO_FILE_DATA)
+		return send_update_extent(sctx, offset, end - offset);
+
 	p = fs_path_alloc();
 	if (!p)
 		return -ENOMEM;