linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 10/12] ARM: dts: exynos5250: add DSI node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 28 May 2018 18:36:47 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To:     Maciej Purski <m.purski@...sung.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        "linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org" 
        <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
        Archit Taneja <architt@...eaurora.org>,
        Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
        Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
        Inki Dae <inki.dae@...sung.com>,
        Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@...sung.com>,
        Seung-Woo Kim <sw0312.kim@...sung.com>,
        Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/12] ARM: dts: exynos5250: add DSI node

On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 11:54 AM, Maciej Purski <m.purski@...sung.com> wrote:
> The patch adds common part of DSI node for Exynos5250 platforms.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Maciej Purski <m.purski@...sung.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi | 14 ++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)


This should be squashed with previous patch because it is logically
the same feature. The purpose of PHY is this DSI node so splitting it
is slightly too much.

Best regards,
Krzysztof