linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.14 429/496] perf/x86/intel: Properly save/restore the PMU state in the NMI handler

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 28 May 2018 12:03:34 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>, acme@...nel.org,
        kernel test robot <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 429/496] perf/x86/intel: Properly save/restore the PMU state in the NMI handler

4.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>

[ Upstream commit 82d71ed0277efc45360828af8c4e4d40e1b45352 ]

The PMU is disabled in intel_pmu_handle_irq(), but cpuc->enabled is not updated
accordingly.

This is fine in current usage because no-one checks it - but fix it
for future code: for example, the drain_pebs() will be modified to
fix an auto-reload bug.

Properly save/restore the old PMU state.

Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>
Cc: acme@...nel.org
Cc: kernel test robot <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/6f44ee84-56f8-79f1-559b-08e371eaeb78@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 arch/x86/events/intel/core.c |   10 +++++++++-
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
@@ -2201,16 +2201,23 @@ static int intel_pmu_handle_irq(struct p
 	int bit, loops;
 	u64 status;
 	int handled;
+	int pmu_enabled;
 
 	cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
 
 	/*
+	 * Save the PMU state.
+	 * It needs to be restored when leaving the handler.
+	 */
+	pmu_enabled = cpuc->enabled;
+	/*
 	 * No known reason to not always do late ACK,
 	 * but just in case do it opt-in.
 	 */
 	if (!x86_pmu.late_ack)
 		apic_write(APIC_LVTPC, APIC_DM_NMI);
 	intel_bts_disable_local();
+	cpuc->enabled = 0;
 	__intel_pmu_disable_all();
 	handled = intel_pmu_drain_bts_buffer();
 	handled += intel_bts_interrupt();
@@ -2320,7 +2327,8 @@ again:
 
 done:
 	/* Only restore PMU state when it's active. See x86_pmu_disable(). */
-	if (cpuc->enabled)
+	cpuc->enabled = pmu_enabled;
+	if (pmu_enabled)
 		__intel_pmu_enable_all(0, true);
 	intel_bts_enable_local();