lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 30 May 2018 20:23:48 +0530
From:   Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Maciej Purski <m.purski@...sung.com>,
        Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
        Carlos Hernandez <ceh@...com>, Tom Gall <tom.gall@...aro.org>,
        Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
        Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: Regression in Linux next again

On 30 May 2018 at 20:03, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 04:03:15PM +0200, Maciej Purski wrote:
>
>> I'm afraid, I have no idea, how to fix it quickly. You can revert it and
>> in the next version I'll fix the build error and split the last patch even
>> more, so we could perform a more precise bisection. I'd be grateful if you
>> could push it on your test coupled branch and Tony could test it again before
>> merging it with next again.
>
> Yeah, if we could get testing from Tony first that'd be ideal.

Linux next 4.17.0-rc7-next-20180529 boot failed on x15 device.
Manually reproduced boot failed problem on x15 device.
The qemu_arm32 boots successfully.

Ref bug:
LKFT: linux-next: Boot failed on beagle board x15
https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3863

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ