| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 23:10:40 +0800
From: Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
To: jaegeuk@...nel.org
Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] f2fs: fix to correct return value of f2fs_trim_fs
From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
We should account trimmed block number from __wait_all_discard_cmd
in __issue_discard_cmd_range, otherwise trimmed blocks returned
by f2fs_trim_fs will be wrong, this patch fixes it.
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
---
v2:
- fix to add missing return value in __wait_all_discard_cmd.
fs/f2fs/segment.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
index 4b24a68f4dc7..66983acaad16 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
@@ -1319,21 +1319,21 @@ static unsigned int __wait_discard_cmd_range(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
return trimmed;
}
-static void __wait_all_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
+static unsigned int __wait_all_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
struct discard_policy *dpolicy)
{
struct discard_policy dp;
+ unsigned int discard_blks;
- if (dpolicy) {
- __wait_discard_cmd_range(sbi, dpolicy, 0, UINT_MAX);
- return;
- }
+ if (dpolicy)
+ return __wait_discard_cmd_range(sbi, dpolicy, 0, UINT_MAX);
/* wait all */
__init_discard_policy(sbi, &dp, DPOLICY_FSTRIM, 1);
- __wait_discard_cmd_range(sbi, &dp, 0, UINT_MAX);
+ discard_blks = __wait_discard_cmd_range(sbi, &dp, 0, UINT_MAX);
__init_discard_policy(sbi, &dp, DPOLICY_UMOUNT, 1);
- __wait_discard_cmd_range(sbi, &dp, 0, UINT_MAX);
+ discard_blks += __wait_discard_cmd_range(sbi, &dp, 0, UINT_MAX);
+ return 0;
}
/* This should be covered by global mutex, &sit_i->sentry_lock */
@@ -2365,7 +2365,7 @@ bool f2fs_exist_trim_candidates(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
return has_candidate;
}
-static void __issue_discard_cmd_range(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
+static unsigned int __issue_discard_cmd_range(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
struct discard_policy *dpolicy,
unsigned int start, unsigned int end)
{
@@ -2375,6 +2375,7 @@ static void __issue_discard_cmd_range(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
struct discard_cmd *dc;
struct blk_plug plug;
int issued;
+ unsigned int trimmed = 0;
next:
issued = 0;
@@ -2410,7 +2411,7 @@ static void __issue_discard_cmd_range(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
blk_finish_plug(&plug);
mutex_unlock(&dcc->cmd_lock);
- __wait_all_discard_cmd(sbi, NULL);
+ trimmed += __wait_all_discard_cmd(sbi, NULL);
congestion_wait(BLK_RW_ASYNC, HZ/50);
goto next;
}
@@ -2424,6 +2425,8 @@ static void __issue_discard_cmd_range(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
blk_finish_plug(&plug);
mutex_unlock(&dcc->cmd_lock);
+
+ return trimmed;
}
int f2fs_trim_fs(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct fstrim_range *range)
@@ -2434,7 +2437,7 @@ int f2fs_trim_fs(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct fstrim_range *range)
block_t start_block, end_block;
struct cp_control cpc;
struct discard_policy dpolicy;
- unsigned long long trimmed = 0;
+ unsigned long long trimmed;
int err = 0;
if (start >= MAX_BLKADDR(sbi) || range->len < sbi->blocksize)
@@ -2472,8 +2475,9 @@ int f2fs_trim_fs(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct fstrim_range *range)
end_block = START_BLOCK(sbi, end_segno + 1);
__init_discard_policy(sbi, &dpolicy, DPOLICY_FSTRIM, cpc.trim_minlen);
- __issue_discard_cmd_range(sbi, &dpolicy, start_block, end_block);
- trimmed = __wait_discard_cmd_range(sbi, &dpolicy,
+ trimmed = __issue_discard_cmd_range(sbi, &dpolicy,
+ start_block, end_block);
+ trimmed += __wait_discard_cmd_range(sbi, &dpolicy,
start_block, end_block);
range->len = F2FS_BLK_TO_BYTES(trimmed);
out:
--
2.16.2.17.g38e79b1fd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists