linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/13] convert block layer to bioset_init()/mempool

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 30 May 2018 15:34:35 -0400
From:   Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc:     Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org, hch@...radead.org, colyli@...e.de,
        darrick.wong@...cle.com, clm@...com, bacik@...com,
        linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, drbd-dev@...ts.linbit.com,
        linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
        neilb@...e.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] convert block layer to bioset_init()/mempool_init()

On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 12:55:48PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 5/30/18 7:36 AM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > So revisiting this patchset: are you inclined to take these changes (I
> > assume yes)?  If so, what would you need in order to get them staged for
> > 4.18?  I'll start with offering my review in reply to the DM patch.  I'd
> > much prefer to see this level of change go in sooner rather than later.
> 
> Yeah I'd like to take the changes, but we might have to wait for
> 4.19 at this point. It'd certainly help to have the dm bits reviewed,
> as they are some of the larger ones. The grunt of the others are mostly
> trivial and smaller in scope.

I don't have a strong opinion on 4.18 vs. 4.19, but I'm available to do whatever
fixups are needed if it'll help get them in faster.