lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 31 May 2018 08:55:10 -0500
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        "H . Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@...delico.com>,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
        Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
        Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.co.uk>,
        Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/8] dt-bindings: gnss: add u-blox binding

On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 3:22 AM, Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 10:58:05PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 12:32:38PM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
>> > Add binding for u-blox GNSS receivers.
>> >
>> > Note that the u-blox product names encodes form factor (e.g. "neo"),
>> > chipset (e.g. "8") and variant (e.g. "q"), but that only formfactor and
>> > chipset is used for the compatible strings (for now).
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
>> > ---
>> >  .../devicetree/bindings/gnss/u-blox.txt       | 44 +++++++++++++++++++
>> >  .../devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt   |  1 +
>> >  2 files changed, 45 insertions(+)
>> >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gnss/u-blox.txt
>> >
>> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gnss/u-blox.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gnss/u-blox.txt
>> > new file mode 100644
>> > index 000000000000..caef9ace0b0c
>> > --- /dev/null
>> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gnss/u-blox.txt
>> > @@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
>> > +u-blox GNSS Receiver DT binding
>> > +
>> > +The u-blox GNSS receivers can use UART, DDC (I2C), SPI and USB interfaces.
>> > +
>> > +Please see Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gnss/gnss.txt for generic
>> > +properties.
>> > +
>> > +Required properties:
>> > +
>> > +- compatible       : Must be one of
>>
>> mixture of space and tab here.
>
> Oops. Same single space character before the tab here in all three
> binding docs (and in the in-tree slave_devices.txt which I think I used
> as a template).

Who wrote that crap? ;)

> Do you want me to fix this even if this turns out to be the only thing
> that needs to be addressed in a v3?

No

>
>> > +
>> > +                   "u-blox,neo-8"
>> > +                   "u-blox,neo-m8"
>> > +
>> > +- vcc-supply       : Main voltage regulator
>> > +
>> > +Required properties (DDC):
>> > +- reg              : DDC (I2C) slave address
>> > +
>> > +Required properties (SPI):
>> > +- reg              : SPI chip select address
>> > +
>> > +Required properties (USB):
>> > +- reg              : Number of the USB hub port or the USB host-controller port
>> > +                  to which this device is attached
>> > +
>> > +Optional properties:
>> > +
>> > +- timepulse-gpios  : Time pulse GPIO
>> > +- u-blox,extint-gpios      : External interrupt GPIO
>>
>> This should be interrupts property instead of a gpio.
>
> Contrary to what the name may suggest, this pin is actually an input
> which can be used to control active power or to provide time or
> frequency aiding data to the receiver (see section 1.13 in [1]).
>
> I only added it for completeness as the driver does not use it
> currently. Remove, leave as is, or add "input" to the description as in:
>
>         - u-blox,extint-gpios   : External interrupt input GPIO

Yes. You should also define the active level.

Rob

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ