lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 31 May 2018 15:16:20 -0700
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:     Ray Jui <ray.jui@...adcom.com>,
        Clément Péron <peron.clem@...il.com>
Cc:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
        Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
        Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
        Jon Mason <jonmason@...adcom.com>, Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
        BCM Kernel Feedback <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
        Clément Peron <clement.peron@...ialet.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: debug: Add Iproc UART3 debug addresses



On 05/31/2018 10:24 AM, Ray Jui wrote:
> 
> 
> On 5/31/2018 1:22 AM, Clément Péron wrote:
>> Hi Rai,
>>
>> On Wed, 30 May 2018 at 19:25, Ray Jui <ray.jui@...adcom.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Clément,
>>>
>>> Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought the trend is to move to use
>>> earlycon that can be activated from kernel command line for early print
>>> before the serial driver is loaded.
>>>
>>> Have you tried earlcon?
>> No, only tested this method.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Clement
>>
> 
> If I remember it correctly, I think the trend is to use earlycon. There
> are obvious shortcomings by making this configuration compile time based.

This is true, though on ARM 32-bit kernels DEBUG_LL gets used by the
kernel self-decompressor and also before earlycon has a chance to run,
this is useful to debugging memory issues where your memory
configuration is incorrect typically.

Either way is fine with me (accepting or dropping) the patch, though
there is probably minimal impact in just accepting such a change.

-- 
Florian

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ