linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 05/16] lib: overflow: Add memory allocation overflow tests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 1 Jun 2018 13:18:29 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:     Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@...rosoft.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 05/16] lib: overflow: Add memory allocation overflow tests

On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 3:42 AM, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
> Make sure that the memory allocators are behaving as expected in the face
> of overflows.

>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/overflow.h>
>  #include <linux/types.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/device.h>
> +#include <linux/mm.h>

A nit, can we keep it in order?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko