linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/29] 4.9.106-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 5 Jun 2018 11:44:45 +0530
From:   Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, patches@...nelci.org,
        Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        linux- stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/29] 4.9.106-stable review

On 4 June 2018 at 12:27, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.106 release.
> There are 29 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed Jun  6 06:57:52 UTC 2018.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.9.106-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.9.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm and x86_64.

NOTE: LTP fs "read_all_sys" broken on hikey and this is always reproducible.
But test PASS on qemu_arm64.
"read_all_sys" is not a real failure consider this as waiver and will
investigate.

Test log:
------------
read_all -d /sys -q -r 10
incrementing stop
tst_test.c:1015: INFO: Timeout per run is 0h 15m 00s
read_all.c:317: BROK: queue_push(workers[j].q, path) timed out

Summary
------------------------------------------------------------------------

kernel: 4.9.106-rc1
git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
git branch: linux-4.9.y
git commit: b0a024051e17ad3bdd5f6b1e52f5c67fb6087cb9
git describe: v4.9.105-31-gb0a024051e17
Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.9-oe/build/v4.9.105-31-gb0a024051e17

No regressions (compared to build v4.9.105)

<Full report not generated due to infrastructure issues>
<end of report>