linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND] pwm: berlin: Don't use broken prescaler values

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 5 Jun 2018 11:10:02 +0200
From:   Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To:     Thomas Hebb <tommyhebb@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...e-electrons.com>,
        sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com, jszhang@...vell.com,
        "open list:PWM SUBSYSTEM" <linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] pwm: berlin: Don't use broken prescaler values

On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 02:32:41PM -0400, Thomas Hebb wrote:
> Six of the eight prescaler values available for Berlin PWM are not true
> prescalers but rather internal shifts that throw away the high bits of
> TCNT. Currently, we attempt to use those high bits, leading to erratic
> behavior. Restrict the prescaler configurations we select to only the
> two that respect the full range of TCNT.
> 
> Tested on BG2CD.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Hebb <tommyhebb@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pwm/pwm-berlin.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

Antoine, Jisheng,

can you guys review this patch? I'm personally on the fence about this,
even if we can technically do the shift in software, I don't necessarily
see a reason why we can't "offload" to the hardware.

Thierry

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)