linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/9] rtc: cros-ec: Switch to SPDX identifier.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 5 Jun 2018 20:51:06 +0200
From:   Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>
To:     Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@...omium.org>, kernel@...labora.com,
        linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org, Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] rtc: cros-ec: Switch to SPDX identifier.

Hi Alexandre,

On 05/06/18 11:46, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> On 05/06/2018 11:22:05+0200, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
>> Adopt the SPDX license identifier headers to ease license compliance
>> management.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>
>> ---
>>
>>  drivers/rtc/rtc-cros-ec.c | 21 +++++----------------
>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>
> Applied, thanks.
> 

Looks like all the ChromeOS drivers should be licensed as GPL v2 only. There was
a mismatch between what the header says and the MODULE_LICENSE and I wrongly
assumed that the MODULE_LICENSE is the one I should follow. So could you not
apply this patch for now and I'll send another version with the correct license?

Thanks and sorry for the inconvenience this may cause you,
 Enric