[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2018 11:16:26 +0100
From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
To: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@...il.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: mathieu.poirier@...aro.org, robh@...nel.org,
frowand.list@...il.com, mark.rutland@....com, sudeep.holla@....com,
arm@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, matt.sealey@....com,
john.horley@....com, charles.garcia-tobin@....com,
coresight@...ts.linaro.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
mike.leach@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/20] coresight: Fix memory leak in coresight_register
On 06/06/2018 07:44 AM, Arvind Yadav wrote:
> Hi Suzuki,
>
>
> On Wednesday 06 June 2018 03:13 AM, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
>> commit 6403587a930c ("coresight: use put_device() instead of kfree()")
>> introduced a memory leak where, if we fail to register the device
>> for coresight_device, we don't free the "coresight_device" object,
>> which was allocated via kzalloc(). Fix this by jumping to the
>> appropriate error path.
> put_device() will decrement the last reference and then
> free the memory by calling dev->release. Internally
> put_device() -> kobject_put() -> kobject_cleanup() which is
> responsible to call 'dev -> release' and also free other kobject
> resources. If you will see the coresight_device_release. There
> we are releasing all allocated memory. Still if you call kfree() again
> then it'll be redundancy.
You're right. I think it would be good to have a comment explaining this
to prevent this fix popping up in the future :-). I will add it
Thanks
Suzuki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists