[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2018 14:25:28 -0600
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clang-format: Set IndentWrappedFunctionNames false
On Wed, Jun 06, 2018 at 01:18:59PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-06-06 at 14:15 -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > The true option causes this indenting for functions:
> >
> > static struct something_very_very_long *
> > function(void *arg)
> > {
> >
> > While a quick survey suggests that the usual Linux fallback is the GNU
> > style:
> >
> > static struct something_very_very_long *
> > function(void *arg)
> >
> []
> > AFAIK the above describes the more common choice in the code base?
> >
> > Not sure who's tree this is supposed to go through.. Andrew I guess?
>
> I believe so yes.
>
> I expect there will be more refinements to .clang-formata
> as perhaps more people experiment with it too.
>
> Acked-by: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Thanks Joe,
I saw your note in the original mailing-list thread and just wanted to
say the way I use clang-format is editor based.
I have a hotkey that triggers clang-format to reformat the current
statement, or current hi-lighted region. If I don't like it, then
'undo' puts it all back for manual adjustment..
This way I am selective of where I apply it, and I find it is
something like 95% of the time good, IHMO.
Big time saver for wrapping long lines, moving code around (eg
indent,de-indent) and other mundane daily tasks.
Cheers,
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists