linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: qcom: Introduce Hexagon V5 based WCSS driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 7 Jun 2018 12:06:00 +0530
From:   Sricharan R <sricharan@...eaurora.org>
To:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Cc:     Vinod <vkoul@...nel.org>, ohad@...ery.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        mark.rutland@....com, andy.gross@...aro.org,
        david.brown@...aro.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        sibis@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: qcom: Introduce Hexagon V5 based WCSS driver

Hi Bjorn,

On 6/7/2018 11:18 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Wed 06 Jun 22:29 PDT 2018, Sricharan R wrote:
> 
>> Hi Bjorn,
>>
>> On 6/7/2018 9:54 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
>>> On Wed 06 Jun 21:11 PDT 2018, Vinod wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 06-06-18, 09:17, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
>>>>> On Tue 05 Jun 05:56 PDT 2018, Sricharan R wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Vinod,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 6/5/2018 11:49 AM, Vinod wrote:
>>>>>>> On 05-06-18, 11:12, Sricharan R wrote:
> [..]
>>> If we ignore SMD for a while we have the following combinations:
>>>
>>> glink/wcss
>>> y     y - valid
>>> y     m - valid
>>> y     n - valid
>>> m     y - link failure (invalid)
>>> m     m - valid
>>> m     n - valid
>>> n     y - valid (platform uses wcss, but not glink)
>>> n     m - valid (-----"-----)
>>> n     n - valid
>>>
>>> So to distill this we have the two valid cases:
>>> module/no if RPMSG_QCOM_GLINK_SMEM=m
>>> yes/module/no if RPMSG_QCOM_GLINK_SMEM=y
>>>
>>> and the way you express that in Kconfig is the somewhat awkward
>>>
>>>   depends on RPMSG_QCOM_GLINK_SMEM || RPMSG_QCOM_GLINK_SMEM=n
>>>
>>
>>  ok, Having "depends on RPMSG_QCOM_GLINK_SMEM" takes care of the
>>  first 6 cases in the above list.
>>
>>  But just was thinking that by allowing the last three combinations,
>>  there is a chance that some config that really needs GLINK_SMEM and WCSS,
>>  but selects only Q6V5_WCSS and misses to select GLINK_SMEM,
>>  would still built and make it non-functional, right ?
>>
> 
> It would allow you to compile a kernel with GLINk disabled that in
> runtime loads a firmware that depends on GLINK being there.
> 
> As it would be convenient to thereby state that "WCSS always depends on
> GLINK" we can make the analog to 410 where "MSS always depends on SMD",
> which isn't true when the same driver is reused on e.g. 845 - which
> uses GLINK.
> 
> 
> So my recommendation is that we stick with Kconfig options that
> describes the build time dependencies of this particular driver, rather
> than its runtime dependencies in a particular platform.
> 

ok thanks. It sort of gave an impression that the last three combinations in
the above list was only for "compile testing". Hence was thinking to have
(COMPILE_TEST && RPMSG_QCOM_GLINK_SMEM=n). Anyways for WCSS, would drop 
the dependency on SMD and just have RPMSG_QCOM_GLINK_SMEM || RPMSG_QCOM_GLINK_SMEM=n.

Regards,
 Sricharan

-- 
"QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus