lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 7 Jun 2018 09:01:30 -0700
From:   Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
To:     Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc:     Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@...b.com>, frederic@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] perf/cputime: Don't stop idle tick if there's live
 cputime event

Hi Jiri,

On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 8:45 AM Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 07, 2018 at 12:15:12AM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > Disable stopping of the idle tick when having live cputime
> > event. When the tick is disabled, the idle counts are out
> > of date until next tick/update and perf cputime PMU provides
> > misleading counts.
>
> I really don't like this. This can totally change performance
> (e.g. less Turbo due to less idle) and performance tools shouldn't
> change the performance profile drastically.
>
You do not want to change the behavior of the kernel just because you
are monitoring.
This may introduce side effects on other events which may not otherwise exist.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ