lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 9 Jun 2018 19:50:42 +0800
From:   kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To:     Sayali Lokhande <sayalil@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     kbuild-all@...org, subhashj@...eaurora.org, cang@...eaurora.org,
        vivek.gautam@...eaurora.org, rnayak@...eaurora.org,
        vinholikatti@...il.com, jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
        martin.petersen@...cle.com, asutoshd@...eaurora.org,
        evgreen@...omium.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
        Sayali Lokhande <sayalil@...eaurora.org>,
        Stanislav Nijnikov <stanislav.nijnikov@....com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/3] scsi: ufs: Add sysfs support for ufs provision

Hi Sayali,

Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:

[auto build test WARNING on robh/for-next]
[also build test WARNING on v4.17 next-20180608]
[cannot apply to mkp-scsi/for-next scsi/for-next]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Sayali-Lokhande/Add-ufs-provisioning-support-in-driver/20180609-151315
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/robh/linux.git for-next
reproduce:
        # apt-get install sparse
        make ARCH=x86_64 allmodconfig
        make C=1 CF=-D__CHECK_ENDIAN__


sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)

>> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-sysfs.c:267:1: sparse: symbol 'dev_attr_ufs_provision' was not declared. Should it be static?

Please review and possibly fold the followup patch.

---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all                   Intel Corporation

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ