linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v9 09/12] KVM: x86: Introduce a function to initialize the PT configuration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 12 Jun 2018 01:30:50 +0000
From:   "Kang, Luwei" <luwei.kang@...el.com>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
CC:     "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        "chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com" <chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com>,
        "thomas.lendacky@....com" <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
        "bp@...e.de" <bp@...e.de>, "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...el.com>,
        "Janakarajan.Natarajan@....com" <Janakarajan.Natarajan@....com>,
        "dwmw@...zon.co.uk" <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "mathieu.poirier@...aro.org" <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        "kstewart@...uxfoundation.org" <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "rkrcmar@...hat.com" <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        "david@...hat.com" <david@...hat.com>,
        "bsd@...hat.com" <bsd@...hat.com>,
        "yu.c.zhang@...ux.intel.com" <yu.c.zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
        "joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v9 09/12] KVM: x86: Introduce a function to initialize
 the PT configuration

> >>> +	/* Initialize and clear the no dependency bits */
> >>> +	vmx->pt_desc.ctl_bitmask = ~0ULL;
> >> This looks redundant, doesn't it?
> > This is a bit mask for RTIT_CTL MSR and it will make & with the value of RTIT_CLT from guest.
> > The reserved bits will be 1 in this bit mask and the setable  bits are 0.
> >
> >>> +	vmx->pt_desc.ctl_bitmask = ~(RTIT_CTL_TRACEEN | RTIT_CTL_OS |
> >>> +			RTIT_CTL_USR | RTIT_CTL_TSC_EN |
> >> RTIT_CTL_DISRETC);
> 
> But it's set twice, so the first assignment is superfluous.

Oh, I see. Will remove it.

Thanks,
Luwei Kang