linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND v2] dmaengine: pxa: add a default requestor policy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 12 Jun 2018 09:32:35 +0530
From:   Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...aro.org>
To:     Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
Cc:     Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
        Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
        Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [RESEND v2] dmaengine: pxa: add a default requestor policy

On 11-06-18, 21:54, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...aro.org> writes:
> 
> > On 09-06-18, 14:43, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> >> Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr> writes:
> >> 
> >> > As what former drcmr -1 value meant, add a this as a default to each
> >> > channel, ie. that by default no requestor line is used.
> >> >
> >> > This is specifically used for network drivers smc91x and smc911x, and
> >> > needed for their port to slave maps.
> >> >
> >> > Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> >> > Signed-off-by: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
> >> > ---
> >> > Since v1: changed -1 to U32_MAX
> >> Hi Vinod,
> >> 
> >> Could I have your ack on this so that I add this one to the dma slave map serie
> >> after the merge window is closed please ?
> >
> > Sorry I was thinking it would go thru dmaengine tree, please do
> > indicate if that is not the case. Nevertheless
> >
> > Acked-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
> Thanks.
> 
> As this is a dependency to the serie, I'd rather take it, unless you insist, in
> which case I'll rely on the fact that it will hit 4.19 cycle.

It fine if you take, just that it helps to indicate the route to take
for a patch :)

-- 
~Vinod