linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 26/28] drm/mediatek: add DPI1/DSI1/DSI2/DSI3 in comp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 13 Jun 2018 15:35:05 +0800
From:   CK Hu <ck.hu@...iatek.com>
To:     Stu Hsieh <stu.hsieh@...iatek.com>
CC:     Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, <srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 26/28] drm/mediatek: add DPI1/DSI1/DSI2/DSI3 in comp_init

Hi, Stu:

On Mon, 2018-06-11 at 11:26 +0800, Stu Hsieh wrote:
> This patch add components DPI1/DSI1/DSI2/DSI3 in comp_init.
> Because the some parameter for these components initialized
> in their driver.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stu Hsieh <stu.hsieh@...iatek.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c
> index 22f4c72fa785..ff974d82a4a6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c
> @@ -278,7 +278,11 @@ int mtk_ddp_comp_init(struct device *dev, struct device_node *node,
>  
>  	if (comp_id == DDP_COMPONENT_BLS ||
>  	    comp_id == DDP_COMPONENT_DPI0 ||
> +	    comp_id == DDP_COMPONENT_DPI1 ||

Why not move this modification to the patch 'add component DPI1'?

>  	    comp_id == DDP_COMPONENT_DSI0 ||
> +	    comp_id == DDP_COMPONENT_DSI1 ||
> +	    comp_id == DDP_COMPONENT_DSI2 ||

Why not move this modification to the patch 'add component DSI2'?

> +	    comp_id == DDP_COMPONENT_DSI3 ||

Why not move this modification to the patch 'add component DSI3'?

Regards,
CK

>  	    comp_id == DDP_COMPONENT_PWM0) {
>  		comp->regs = NULL;
>  		comp->clk = NULL;