lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 18:04:24 +0200 From: Jernej Škrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net> To: linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com, maxime.ripard@...tlin.com Cc: wens@...e.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, airlied@...ux.ie, gustavo@...ovan.org, maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com, seanpaul@...omium.org, mark.rutland@....com, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v2 24/27] drm: of: Export drm_crtc_port_mask() Dne sreda, 13. junij 2018 ob 09:36:05 CEST je Maxime Ripard napisal(a): > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 10:00:33PM +0200, Jernej Skrabec wrote: > > Function is useful when drm_of_find_possible_crtcs() can't be used and > > custom parsing is needed. This can happen for example when there is a > > node with multiple muxes between crtc and encoder. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net> > > --- > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c | 4 ++-- > > include/drm/drm_of.h | 8 ++++++++ > > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c > > index 1fe122461298..2e9cea3287b2 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c > > @@ -22,8 +22,8 @@ static void drm_release_of(struct device *dev, void > > *data)> > > * Given a port OF node, return the possible mask of the corresponding > > * CRTC within a device's list of CRTCs. Returns zero if not found. > > */ > > > > -static uint32_t drm_crtc_port_mask(struct drm_device *dev, > > - struct device_node *port) > > +uint32_t drm_crtc_port_mask(struct drm_device *dev, > > + struct device_node *port) > > It should probably be exported too? Yes, of course. It will be in next version. Best regards, Jernej
Powered by blists - more mailing lists