linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: avoid alloc memory on offline node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 14 Jun 2018 14:23:59 +0800
From:   Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>
To:     Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@....com>,
        Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@...wei.com>
CC:     Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>, <tnowicki@...iumnetworks.com>,
        <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        <linux-mm@...ck.org>, <wanghuiqiang@...wei.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        zhongjiang <zhongjiang@...wei.com>,
        linux-arm <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: avoid alloc memory on offline node

Hi Punit,

On 2018/6/14 1:39, Punit Agrawal wrote:
> Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@....com> writes:
> 
> 
> [...]
> 
>>
>> CONFIG_HAVE_MEMORYLESS node is not enabled on arm64 which means we end
>> up returning the original node in the fallback path.
>>
>> Xie, does the below patch help? I can submit a proper patch if this
>> fixes the issue for you.
>>
>> -- >8 --
>> Subject: [PATCH] arm64/numa: Enable memoryless numa nodes
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@....com>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm64/Kconfig   | 4 ++++
>>  arch/arm64/mm/numa.c | 2 ++
>>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
>> index eb2cf4938f6d..5317e9aa93ab 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
>> @@ -756,6 +756,10 @@ config USE_PERCPU_NUMA_NODE_ID
>>  	def_bool y
>>  	depends on NUMA
>>  
>> +config HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES
>> +       def_bool y
>> +       depends on NUMA
>> +
>>  config HAVE_SETUP_PER_CPU_AREA
>>  	def_bool y
>>  	depends on NUMA
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
>> index dad128ba98bf..c699dcfe93de 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
>> @@ -73,6 +73,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpumask_of_node);
>>  static void map_cpu_to_node(unsigned int cpu, int nid)
>>  {
>>  	set_cpu_numa_node(cpu, nid);
>> +	set_numa_mem(local_memory_node(nid));
> 
> Argh, this should be
> 
>         set_cpu_numa_mem(cpu, local_memory_node(nid));
> 
> There is not guarantee that map_cpu_to_node() will be called on the
> local cpu.
> 
> Hanjun, Xie - can you try with the update please?

Thanks for looking into this, we will try this tomorrow
(the hardware is occupied now) and update here.

Thanks
Hanjun