linux-kernel - Re: what trees/branches to test on syzbot

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 18 Jun 2018 14:52:46 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Cc:     "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        Guenter Roeck <groeck@...gle.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        syzkaller <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: what trees/branches to test on syzbot

Hi Dmitry,

On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 11:54:16 +0200 Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> Re backwards bisection (when bug is introduced), we can actually test
> linux-next-history instead of linux-next, right?

I don't see why using linux-next-history would be any better, it just
contains all the linux-next releases while the linux-next tree contains
the last 3 months worth.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped