linux-kernel - [PATCH 3/6] mailbox: ti-msgmgr: Change message count mask to be descriptor based

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 19 Jun 2018 14:43:34 -0500
From:   Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
To:     Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
CC:     Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>,
        Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3/6] mailbox: ti-msgmgr: Change message count mask to be descriptor based

Change mask used to extract the message count to be descriptor based.

This is to support changes for count location for various SoC
solutions.

Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
---
Changes since RFC: None
RFC: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10447671/

 drivers/mailbox/ti-msgmgr.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/ti-msgmgr.c b/drivers/mailbox/ti-msgmgr.c
index 91c955979008..7d2eb4b359ba 100644
--- a/drivers/mailbox/ti-msgmgr.c
+++ b/drivers/mailbox/ti-msgmgr.c
@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ struct ti_msgmgr_valid_queue_desc {
  * @max_messages:	Number of messages
  * @data_first_reg:	First data register for proxy data region
  * @data_last_reg:	Last data register for proxy data region
+ * @status_cnt_mask:	Mask for getting the status value
  * @tx_polled:		Do I need to use polled mechanism for tx
  * @tx_poll_timeout_ms: Timeout in ms if polled
  * @valid_queues:	List of Valid queues that the processor can access
@@ -58,6 +59,7 @@ struct ti_msgmgr_desc {
 	u8 max_messages;
 	u8 data_first_reg;
 	u8 data_last_reg;
+	u32 status_cnt_mask;
 	bool tx_polled;
 	int tx_poll_timeout_ms;
 	const struct ti_msgmgr_valid_queue_desc *valid_queues;
@@ -116,20 +118,24 @@ struct ti_msgmgr_inst {
 
 /**
  * ti_msgmgr_queue_get_num_messages() - Get the number of pending messages
+ * @d:		Description of message manager
  * @qinst:	Queue instance for which we check the number of pending messages
  *
  * Return: number of messages pending in the queue (0 == no pending messages)
  */
-static inline int ti_msgmgr_queue_get_num_messages(struct ti_queue_inst *qinst)
+static inline int
+ti_msgmgr_queue_get_num_messages(const struct ti_msgmgr_desc *d,
+				 struct ti_queue_inst *qinst)
 {
 	u32 val;
+	u32 status_cnt_mask = d->status_cnt_mask;
 
 	/*
 	 * We cannot use relaxed operation here - update may happen
 	 * real-time.
 	 */
-	val = readl(qinst->queue_state) & Q_STATE_ENTRY_COUNT_MASK;
-	val >>= __ffs(Q_STATE_ENTRY_COUNT_MASK);
+	val = readl(qinst->queue_state) & status_cnt_mask;
+	val >>= __ffs(status_cnt_mask);
 
 	return val;
 }
@@ -167,8 +173,9 @@ static irqreturn_t ti_msgmgr_queue_rx_interrupt(int irq, void *p)
 		return IRQ_NONE;
 	}
 
+	desc = inst->desc;
 	/* Do I actually have messages to read? */
-	msg_count = ti_msgmgr_queue_get_num_messages(qinst);
+	msg_count = ti_msgmgr_queue_get_num_messages(desc, qinst);
 	if (!msg_count) {
 		/* Shared IRQ? */
 		dev_dbg(dev, "Spurious event - 0 pending data!\n");
@@ -181,7 +188,6 @@ static irqreturn_t ti_msgmgr_queue_rx_interrupt(int irq, void *p)
 	 * of how many bytes I should be reading. Let the client figure this
 	 * out.. I just read the full message and pass it on..
 	 */
-	desc = inst->desc;
 	message.len = desc->max_message_size;
 	message.buf = (u8 *)qinst->rx_buff;
 
@@ -224,12 +230,14 @@ static irqreturn_t ti_msgmgr_queue_rx_interrupt(int irq, void *p)
 static bool ti_msgmgr_queue_peek_data(struct mbox_chan *chan)
 {
 	struct ti_queue_inst *qinst = chan->con_priv;
+	struct device *dev = chan->mbox->dev;
+	struct ti_msgmgr_inst *inst = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
 	int msg_count;
 
 	if (qinst->is_tx)
 		return false;
 
-	msg_count = ti_msgmgr_queue_get_num_messages(qinst);
+	msg_count = ti_msgmgr_queue_get_num_messages(inst->desc, qinst);
 
 	return msg_count ? true : false;
 }
@@ -243,12 +251,14 @@ static bool ti_msgmgr_queue_peek_data(struct mbox_chan *chan)
 static bool ti_msgmgr_last_tx_done(struct mbox_chan *chan)
 {
 	struct ti_queue_inst *qinst = chan->con_priv;
+	struct device *dev = chan->mbox->dev;
+	struct ti_msgmgr_inst *inst = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
 	int msg_count;
 
 	if (!qinst->is_tx)
 		return false;
 
-	msg_count = ti_msgmgr_queue_get_num_messages(qinst);
+	msg_count = ti_msgmgr_queue_get_num_messages(inst->desc, qinst);
 
 	/* if we have any messages pending.. */
 	return msg_count ? false : true;
@@ -523,6 +533,7 @@ static const struct ti_msgmgr_desc k2g_desc = {
 	.max_messages = 128,
 	.data_first_reg = 16,
 	.data_last_reg = 31,
+	.status_cnt_mask = Q_STATE_ENTRY_COUNT_MASK,
 	.tx_polled = false,
 	.valid_queues = k2g_valid_queues,
 	.num_valid_queues = ARRAY_SIZE(k2g_valid_queues),
-- 
2.15.1