lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 19 Jun 2018 11:32:44 +0200
From:   Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To:     Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
Cc:     Maninder Singh <maninder1.s@...sung.com>,
        sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, a.sahrawat@...sung.com,
        pankaj.m@...sung.com, v.narang@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] printk: make sure to print log on console.

On Mon 2018-06-18 15:23:06, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (06/18/18 15:15), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > 
> > On (06/01/18 14:26), Maninder Singh wrote:
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Vaneet Narang <v.narang@...sung.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Maninder Singh <maninder1.s@...sung.com>
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
> 
> OK, we probably need v3 after all.
> 
> I think this
> 
> -               if (suppress_message_printing(msg->level)) {
> +               if (msg->flags & LOG_NOCONS) {
> 
> must be changed to
> 
> -               if (suppress_message_printing(msg->level)) {
> +               if (!ignore_loglevel && (msg->flags & LOG_NOCONS)) {
> 
> 
> `ignore_loglevel' is a module param and can change any time via
> 	/sys/module/printk/parameters/ignore_loglevel
> we need to respect its value.

I would prefer to keep the patch as is. I see it the following way.

Also console_loglevel can be changed anytime by /proc/sys/kernel/printk.
The patch basically moves the decision about the message visibility from
console_unlock() to vprintk_emit(). The logic is easier when all
aspects are handled in a single location and only once.

Best Regards,
Petr

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ