lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 20 Jun 2018 13:38:20 -0700
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
        Alasdair Kergon <agk@...hat.com>,
        Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>,
        Giovanni Cabiddu <giovanni.cabiddu@...el.com>,
        Lars Persson <larper@...s.com>,
        Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>,
        Rabin Vincent <rabinv@...s.com>,
        Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "open list:HARDWARE RANDOM NUMBER GENERATOR CORE" 
        <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>, qat-linux@...el.com,
        dm-devel@...hat.com,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] crypto: skcipher: Remove VLA usage for SKCIPHER_REQUEST_ON_STACK

On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 12:44 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 9:04 PM, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
>> In the quest to remove all stack VLA usage from the kernel[1], this
>> caps the skcipher request size similar to other limits and adds a sanity
>> check at registration.
>>
>>
>> +#define SKCIPHER_MAX_REQSIZE   (PAGE_SIZE / 8)
>> +
>>  #define SKCIPHER_REQUEST_ON_STACK(name, tfm) \
>>         char __##name##_desc[sizeof(struct skcipher_request) + \
>> -               crypto_skcipher_reqsize(tfm)] CRYPTO_MINALIGN_ATTR; \
>> +               SKCIPHER_MAX_REQSIZE] CRYPTO_MINALIGN_ATTR; \
>>         struct skcipher_request *name = (void *)__##name##_desc
>>
>
> This is probably a bad idea on kernels with large values of PAGE_SIZE.
> Some users on ppc64 and arm64 use 64KB here, but still limit
> the per-function stack size to 2KB.

We could make all of these PAGE_SIZE-related limits explicitly 512? I
think that was the intent originally.

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Pixel Security

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ