linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3.18 00/21] 3.18.113-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 19 Jun 2018 19:18:22 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "kernelci.org bot" <bot@...nelci.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.18 00/21] 3.18.113-stable review

On 06/19/2018 05:36 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> writes:
> 
>> On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 05:09:11PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>>> Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> writes:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 03:08:12PM -0700, kernelci.org bot wrote:
>>>>> stable-rc/linux-3.18.y boot: 52 boots: 28 failed, 18 passed with 1 offline, 5 conflicts (v3.18.112-22-gb0582263e3c9)
>>>>>
>>>>> Full Boot Summary: https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/stable-rc/branch/linux-3.18.y/kernel/v3.18.112-22-gb0582263e3c9/
>>>>> Full Build Summary: https://kernelci.org/build/stable-rc/branch/linux-3.18.y/kernel/v3.18.112-22-gb0582263e3c9/
>>>>>
>>>>> Tree: stable-rc
>>>>> Branch: linux-3.18.y
>>>>> Git Describe: v3.18.112-22-gb0582263e3c9
>>>>> Git Commit: b0582263e3c9810fd887ca92d19cb9ff30a4d9f6
>>>>> Git URL: http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
>>>>> Tested: 24 unique boards, 12 SoC families, 13 builds out of 183
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>>
>>>> That is a lot of new failures, did the whole lab fail, or is this really
>>>> a problem in v3.18.112 here?
>>>
>>> Whole lab failure (more precisely, lab operator failure)  ;)
>>>
>>> gak, I updated the rootfs images to the latest buildroot, which forced
>>> me to upgrade the kernel headers used to build the rootfs from v3.10 to
>>> v4.4.  So I guess it's no surprise that every single board panic'd as
>>> soon as it hit userspace.
>>>
>> I build my root file systems with buildroot, and had a similar problem. My fix
>> was to patch buildroot to let me use older linux headers.
> 
> Could you share the patch?
> 

Try git@...hub.com:groeck/buildroot.git branch local-2018.05.

Guenter