linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] kbuild: add macro for controlling warnings to linux/compiler.h

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 20 Jun 2018 17:02:23 -0700
From:   Paul Burton <paul.burton@...s.com>
To:     Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
CC:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Linux-MIPS <linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
        He Zhe <zhe.he@...driver.com>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
        Khem Raj <raj.khem@...il.com>,
        Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Stafford Horne <shorne@...il.com>,
        Gideon Israel Dsouza <gidisrael@...il.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] kbuild: add macro for controlling warnings to
 linux/compiler.h

Hi Masahiro,

On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 08:21:01AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> V2 is good except one nit.
> (I left a comment in it)

Thanks, and yes I agree with your comment that the GCC<4.6 __diag()
definition can be removed.

> I can fix it up locally if it is tedious to re-spin, though.

If you wouldn't mind that'd be great :)

Thanks,
    Paul