linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v10 6/9] cpuset: Make generate_sched_domains() recognize reserved

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 21 Jun 2018 16:14:07 +0800
From:   Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-team@...com, pjt@...gle.com, luto@...capital.net,
        Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 6/9] cpuset: Make generate_sched_domains() recognize
 reserved_cpus

On 06/20/2018 10:17 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 12:14:06PM +0800, Waiman Long wrote:
>> The generate_sched_domains() function is modified to make it work
>> correctly with the newly introduced reserved_cpus mask for schedule
>> domains generation.
> Why isn't this (and the previous) patch part of the patch that
> introduces reserved_cpus? It seems weird to have this broken
> intermediate state.

I was trying to break the reserved cpu patch into smaller meaningful
pieces that will be easier to review. The individual patches can be
compiled cleanly one-by-one, though I didn't check if they are
functional if not all of them are applied.

Cheers,
Longman