linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 0/4] ARM: davinci: complete the conversion to using the reset framework

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 21 Jun 2018 13:41:26 +0200
From:   Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To:     Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
Cc:     Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/4] ARM: davinci: complete the conversion to using the
 reset framework

2018-06-21 12:52 GMT+02:00 Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>:
> Hi Bartosz,
>
> On Thursday 21 June 2018 01:07 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
>>
>> These are the remaining patches that still need to be merged in order
>> to complete the conversion of the davinci dsp driver to using the reset
>> framework.
>>
>> They apply on top of v4.18-rc1 with David Lechner's remaining patches
>> merged.
>
> Series looks good to me.
>
> To preserve bisect, shouldn't the order of applying be patch #3, #4, #1
> and #2 ?
>
> Given the dependencies and to preserve bisect its easiest if I take the
> series with acks from remoteproc and clock maintainers.
>
> Open to other suggestions as well.
>
> Thanks,
> Sekhar

Oops you're right about the order. Do you want me to resend?

Bart