linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND] x86: optimize memcpy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 21 Jun 2018 16:31:40 +0200
From:   Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:     Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        device-mapper development <dm-devel@...hat.com>,
        X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND] x86: optimize memcpy_flushcache


* Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com> wrote:

> From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v2] x86: optimize memcpy_flushcache
> 
> In the context of constant short length stores to persistent memory,
> memcpy_flushcache suffers from a 2% performance degradation compared to
> explicitly using the "movnti" instruction.
> 
> Optimize 4, 8, and 16 byte memcpy_flushcache calls to explicitly use the
> movnti instruction with inline assembler.

Linus requested asm optimizations to include actual benchmarks, so it would be 
nice to describe how this was tested, on what hardware, and what the before/after 
numbers are.

Thanks,

	Ingo