linux-kernel - Re: [qemu-s390x] s390 qemu boot failure in -next

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 25 Jun 2018 10:02:28 +0200
From:   Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Cc:     linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>,
        Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>,
        Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@...gnu.org>,
        qemu-s390x <qemu-s390x@...gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [qemu-s390x] s390 qemu boot failure in -next



On 06/25/2018 09:27 AM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Also adding QEMU.
> 
> On 06/25/2018 09:10 AM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 06/22/2018 09:47 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> starting with commit 's390/boot: make head.S and als.c be part of the
>>> decompressor only' in -next, s390 immages no longer boot in qemu.
>>> As far as I can see, the reason is that the command line is no longer
>>> passed from qemu to the kernel, which results in a panic because the
>>> root file system can not be mounted.
>>>
>>> Was this change made on purpose ? If so, is there a way to get qemu
>>> back to working ?
>>
>> Certainly not on purpose.
>>
>> Vasily, I can reproduce this with KVM and an external kernel boot of the vmlinux file (the elf file)
>>
>> e.g.
>>
>> qemu-system-s390 -enable-kvm -nographic -kernel vmlinux -append "this string no longer is command line"
>>
>> The compressed image (bzImage) seems to work fine though.
>>
>> This seems to be an unfortunate side effect of QEMUs ways to "guess" its Linux (checking for start
>> address 0x10000, which is no longer true for the vmlinux file). With the pure vmlinux elf file
>> the load address is 0x100000 as there is no unpacker.
>>
>> Guenter, can you check if arch/s390/boot/bzImage works for you as a workaround?
> 
> Something like this in QEMU 
> 
> diff --git a/hw/s390x/ipl.c b/hw/s390x/ipl.c
> index f278036fa7..14153ce880 100644
> --- a/hw/s390x/ipl.c
> +++ b/hw/s390x/ipl.c
> @@ -187,11 +187,13 @@ static void s390_ipl_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
>           */
>          if (pentry == KERN_IMAGE_START || pentry == 0x800) {
>              ipl->start_addr = KERN_IMAGE_START;
> -            /* Overwrite parameters in the kernel image, which are "rom" */
> -            strcpy(rom_ptr(KERN_PARM_AREA), ipl->cmdline);
>          } else {
>              ipl->start_addr = pentry;
>          }
> +       if (ipl->cmdline) {
> +            /* If there is a command line, put it in the right place */
> +            strcpy(rom_ptr(KERN_PARM_AREA), ipl->cmdline);
> +       }
>  
>          if (ipl->initrd) {
>              ram_addr_t initrd_offset;
> 
> would put the command line in no matter what the start address is.

Ideally we would do 2 changes:
- change QEMU to add a commandline to 10480 if specified
- have a way to fix the kernel elf file to still boot with older QEMUs