linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ASoC: dpcm: improve runtime update predictability

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 25 Jun 2018 21:39:29 +0800
From:   kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To:     Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>
Cc:     kbuild-all@...org, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: dpcm: improve runtime update predictability

Hi Jerome,

I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:

[auto build test WARNING on asoc/for-next]
[also build test WARNING on v4.18-rc2 next-20180625]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Jerome-Brunet/ASoC-dpcm-improve-runtime-update-predictability/20180625-172002
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next
reproduce:
        # apt-get install sparse
        make ARCH=x86_64 allmodconfig
        make C=1 CF=-D__CHECK_ENDIAN__


sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)

   sound/soc/soc-pcm.c:357:32: sparse: expression using sizeof(void)
   sound/soc/soc-pcm.c:357:32: sparse: expression using sizeof(void)
   sound/soc/soc-pcm.c:367:32: sparse: expression using sizeof(void)
   sound/soc/soc-pcm.c:367:32: sparse: expression using sizeof(void)
   sound/soc/soc-pcm.c:417:28: sparse: expression using sizeof(void)
   sound/soc/soc-pcm.c:417:28: sparse: expression using sizeof(void)
   sound/soc/soc-pcm.c:418:28: sparse: expression using sizeof(void)
   sound/soc/soc-pcm.c:418:28: sparse: expression using sizeof(void)
   sound/soc/soc-pcm.c:419:28: sparse: expression using sizeof(void)
   sound/soc/soc-pcm.c:419:28: sparse: expression using sizeof(void)
   sound/soc/soc-pcm.c:420:28: sparse: expression using sizeof(void)
   sound/soc/soc-pcm.c:420:28: sparse: expression using sizeof(void)
   sound/soc/soc-pcm.c:435:28: sparse: expression using sizeof(void)
   sound/soc/soc-pcm.c:435:28: sparse: expression using sizeof(void)
   sound/soc/soc-pcm.c:436:28: sparse: expression using sizeof(void)
   sound/soc/soc-pcm.c:436:28: sparse: expression using sizeof(void)
   sound/soc/soc-pcm.c:445:24: sparse: expression using sizeof(void)
   sound/soc/soc-pcm.c:445:24: sparse: expression using sizeof(void)
   sound/soc/soc-pcm.c:446:24: sparse: expression using sizeof(void)
   sound/soc/soc-pcm.c:446:24: sparse: expression using sizeof(void)
   sound/soc/soc-pcm.c:447:24: sparse: expression using sizeof(void)
   sound/soc/soc-pcm.c:447:24: sparse: expression using sizeof(void)
   sound/soc/soc-pcm.c:448:24: sparse: expression using sizeof(void)
   sound/soc/soc-pcm.c:448:24: sparse: expression using sizeof(void)
   sound/soc/soc-pcm.c:1194:39: sparse: expression using sizeof(void)
   sound/soc/soc-pcm.c:1194:39: sparse: expression using sizeof(void)
   sound/soc/soc-pcm.c:1750:41: sparse: expression using sizeof(void)
   sound/soc/soc-pcm.c:1750:41: sparse: expression using sizeof(void)
   sound/soc/soc-pcm.c:1752:41: sparse: expression using sizeof(void)
   sound/soc/soc-pcm.c:1752:41: sparse: expression using sizeof(void)
   sound/soc/soc-pcm.c:1774:36: sparse: expression using sizeof(void)
   sound/soc/soc-pcm.c:1774:36: sparse: expression using sizeof(void)
   sound/soc/soc-pcm.c:1775:36: sparse: expression using sizeof(void)
   sound/soc/soc-pcm.c:1775:36: sparse: expression using sizeof(void)
>> sound/soc/soc-pcm.c:2600:5: sparse: symbol 'soc_dpcm_fe_runtime_update' was not declared. Should it be static?

Please review and possibly fold the followup patch.

---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all                   Intel Corporation