linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] clk: davinci: cfgchip: testing the wrong variable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 25 Jun 2018 16:33:00 -0700
From:   Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
        David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>
Cc:     Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: davinci: cfgchip: testing the wrong variable

Quoting David Lechner (2018-06-25 16:17:55)
> On 06/02/2018 02:52 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > There is a copy and paste bug here.  We should be testing "usb1" instead
> > of "usb0".
> > 
> > Fixes: 58e1e2d2cd89 ("clk: davinci: cfgchip: Add TI DA8XX USB PHY clocks")
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/davinci/da8xx-cfgchip.c b/drivers/clk/davinci/da8xx-cfgchip.c
> > index c971111d2601..20a120aa147e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/davinci/da8xx-cfgchip.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/davinci/da8xx-cfgchip.c
> > @@ -672,7 +672,7 @@ static int of_da8xx_usb_phy_clk_init(struct device *dev, struct regmap *regmap)
> >   
> >       usb1 = da8xx_cfgchip_register_usb1_clk48(dev, regmap);
> >       if (IS_ERR(usb1)) {
> > -             if (PTR_ERR(usb0) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> > +             if (PTR_ERR(usb1) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> >                       return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> >   
> >               dev_warn(dev, "Failed to register usb1_clk48 (%ld)\n",
> > 
> 
> Applied to https://github.com/dlech/linux/tree/clk-davinci-fixes
> 

Ok. I expect this will be coming in a PR soon? Usually I can pick up
fixes just fine from the list and merge them on up to Linus, unless you
feel the need to pick it into your development tree to base future
development on.