linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next] tcp: replace LINUX_MIB_TCPOFODROP with LINUX_MIB_TCPRMEMFULLDROP for drops due to receive buffer full

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 27 Jun 2018 08:52:42 -0700
From:   Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:     Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:     Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] tcp: replace LINUX_MIB_TCPOFODROP with
 LINUX_MIB_TCPRMEMFULLDROP for drops due to receive buffer full



On 06/27/2018 08:38 AM, Yafang Shao wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 11:27 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 06/27/2018 08:14 AM, Yafang Shao wrote:
>>
>>> Got it!
>>>
>>> What about introduce a new counter, i.e. TCPRcvQFullDrop ?
>>
>> tcp_try_rmem_schedule() can fail for many different reasons,
>> not related to how occupied the socket receive queue is.
> 
> Yes. So TCPRcvQDrop would be more specific ?

Yes, this looks better.