linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 2/2] regulator: add QCOM RPMh regulator driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 28 Jun 2018 11:04:17 -0700
From:   David Collins <collinsd@...eaurora.org>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc:     Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
        Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/2] regulator: add QCOM RPMh regulator driver

Hello Mark,

On 06/28/2018 03:18 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 09:28:03AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> 
>> OK, great.  I guess I'm confused about the "|| COMPILE_TEST" causing
>> problems then?  I was worried that anyone trying to do "COMPILE_TEST"
>> on your tree (or linuxnext if RPMh isn't there) would get failures due
>> to the lack of header files.  I guess if it's a problem you could just
>> gut the "|| COMPILE_TEST" and it could be added back in later?
> 
> Ugh, yes - that'll break things.  In that case I can't apply this
> without a signed tag from Andy's tree with the dependency stuff in.
> 

Do you have any remaining concerns with the qcom-rpmh-regulator binding
and driver patches that would keep you from applying them (other than the
dependency patches being applied first)?

Thanks,
David

-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project