linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf test shell: make perf inet

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 29 Jun 2018 11:11:30 -0500
From:   Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@....com>
To:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Michael Petlan <mpetlan@...hat.com>,
        Hendrik Brückner 
        <brueckner@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Sandipan Das <sandipan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf test shell: make perf inet_pton test more
 portable

On Fri, 29 Jun 2018 12:21:55 -0300
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org> wrote:

> Em Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 03:32:50PM -0500, Kim Phillips escreveu:
> > On Thu, 21 Jun 2018 12:18:00 -0300
> > Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > Would be good if we had some utility that given a two files, one with
> > > regexps, could tell if, line by line, those expressions matched, better,
> > > one that is present in all these OSes...
> > 
> > I didn't find any, but given the two-file notion might be acceptable,
> > hopefully you might find the following more readable/acceptable?:
> 
> Looks better, you build the expected lines in a separate file, then read
> both it and the output, then do the matching, cleaner. And I assume it
> works with dash, right?

Yes, of course :)

I'll re-send via a new v2 series as 1/2 wasn't git-am friendly, and
I've uncovered another minor bashism.

Kim